An analysis of oil hegemony and the challenges of the energy transition from a political economy perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14295/principios.2675-6609.2024.170.002Keywords:
Political economy, Differential rent, Absolute rent, Monopoly rent, Energy appropriationAbstract
This paper analyzes the reasons that led to the hegemony of oil as an energy source and the challenges for the energy transition advocated by broad academic, political and popular sectors. As a methodological framework, it recovers the main elements of political economy such as absolute, relative and extraordinary surplus value, differential, absolute and monopoly rents, prices and production prices to interpret the role of the appropriation of energy in the emergence and consolidation of the capitalist mode of production and the factors and attributes that guided energy transitions and led to the hegemony of oil, within a framework of multiple possibilities of energy resources. It analyzes the geopolitical structure and disputes over income from natural resources, focusing on the control of oil reserves and production, under the coordination of OPEC+ (expanded Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries), with its national companies, in conflict with the interests of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries and China and the independent oil companies. Finally, it presents the table of possibilities for the defossilization of the Brazilian and global energy matrix, through alternatives based on electricity or hydrogen vectors, and analyzes the challenges and impacts for its adoption in the economic, social and political power structure inherent to the capitalist system, whose engine is the accumulation process based on increasing productivity to generate economic surpluses.
Downloads
References
ACADEMIA DE CIÊNCIAS DA URSS. Manual de economia política. Arquivo Marxista na Internet, 1959. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 29 ago. 2024.
ABA, Michael M.; SAUER, Ildo Luís; AMADO, Nilton Bispo. Comparative review of hydrogen and electricity as energy carriers for the energy transition. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, v. 57, p. 660-678, 2024.
ALVAREZ, Carlos G. Economía y política petrolera. Bogotá: Indepaz; USO-Ecopetrol, 2000.
______. La coyuntura minero energética en Colombia y la distribución de la renta petrolera. Ponencia presentada al seminario Redem, Universidad Arcis, Santiago de Chile, Octubre 18 y 19, 2011.
______. La economía de la energía y el precio. Ensayos de Economía, 1993.
______. Renta y geopolítica de la energía. Medellín: Autores Antioqueños, 1988. v. 49.
BINA, Cyrus. Some controversies in the development of rent theory: the nature of oil rent. Capital & Class, v. 13, p. 82-112, 1989.
______. The laws of economic rent and property: application to the oil industry. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 51, n. 2, p. 187-203, 1992.
BP. BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2015. London: British Petroleum, 2015.
CARVALHO, Joaquim Francisco de; MERCEDES, Sonia Seger Pereira; SAUER, Ildo Luis. Precautionary principle, economic and energy systems and social equity. Energy Policy, v. 38, p. 5399-5402, 2010.
EIA. What is OPEC+ and how is it different from OPEC?. Washington, DC: EIA, December 18, 2023.
ENERGY INSTITUTE. Statistical Review of World Energy 2024. 73rd edition. London: Energy Institute, 2024.
EPE. Balanço Energético Nacional 2023. Brasília: Empresa de Pesquisas Energéticas, 2023. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 17 set. 2024.
______. Plano Nacional de Energia 2050. Brasília: Empresa de Pesquisas Energéticas, 2020. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 17 set. 2024.
GONZALEZ, Carlos G. M.; SUAREZ, Carlos; SAUER, Ildo Luís. Considerações históricas para (re)pensar a transição energética global. In: COSTA, Hirdan K. de Medeiros (Coord.). Transição energética, justiça geracional e mudanças climáticas. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2020. v. 1, p. 35-74.
GUEDES, Solange. Pre-salt: what has been done so far and what is coming ahead. 2015 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, May 5th, 2015.
HALL, Charles A. S. Provisional results from EROI assessments. The Oil Drum, April 8, 2008. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 29 ago. 2024.
HALL, Charles; BALOGH, Sepheb; MURPHY, David J. R. What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must have?. Energies, v. 2, p. 25-47, 2009.
HALL, Charles A. S.; HANSEN, D. New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment). Sustainability, special issue, 2011.
HARVEY, David. Limits to capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982.
HOYOS, Carola. The new Seven Sisters: oil and gas giants dwarf western rivals. Financial Times, London, March 11, 2007.
HUBBERT, Marion King. The world's evolving energy system. American Journal of Physics, v. 49, p. 1007-1029, November 1981.
LIMA, Paulo Cézar Ribeiro. A situação econômica, financeira e operacional da Petrobras. Brasília: Consultoria Legislativa da Câmara Federal, mar. 2015.
MARX, Karl. Capital: a critique of political economy. The process of capitalist production as a whole. Ed. Friedrich Engels. New York: International Publishers, [s.d.]. v. 3.
______. Contribuição à crítica da economia política. Tradução Florestan Fernandes. 2. ed. São Paulo: Expressão Popular, 2008.
______. Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Translated by Martin Nicolaus. [Online version]: Penguin, 1997.
______. O capital: crítica da economia política. Livro III: O processo global de produção capitalista. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1968a.
______. Manuscritos econômico-filosóficos. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2005.
______. Theories of surplus-value: volume IV of Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1968b.
MASSARRAT, Mohssen. Crisis de la energía o crisis del capitalismo. Barcelona: Fotamara, 1979.
______. Oil prices and democracy. Osnabrück: Faculty of Social Sciences, Universität Osnabrück, August 2006. Disponível em: <https://mohssenmassarrat.weebly.com/uploads/3/3/8/9/3389565/oilpricesanddemocracyaug.2006.pdf>. Acesso em: 3 dez. 2012.
______. Sostenibilidad a través de la internalización de los costos: contribuciones teóricas al análisis y las reformas de las estructuras globales. In: THIEL, Reinold E. (Ed.). Teoría del desarrollo: nuevos enfoques y problemas. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad, 2001. p. 181-192.
______. Weltenergieproduktion und Neuordnung der Weltwirtschaft: die Weltarbeitsteilung und die Neuverteilung des Reichtums in der Welt. Frankfurt; New York: Campus Verlag, 1980.
MOMMER, B. La cuestión petrolera. Caracas: Asociación de Profesores UCV; Tropykos, 1988.
______. Oil prices and fiscal regimes. Oxford: Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, May 1999.
______. Petróleo global y Estado nacional. Caracas: Comala, 2003.
NAVA, Pablo Carrizalez; SAUER, Ildo Luís. Intercambio desigual y renta petrolera: una aproximación teórica necesaria. Cadernos Ceru, v. 28, p. 196-218, 2017.
OPEC. World oil outlook. Vienna: Opec, 2023. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 29 ago. 2024.
OPEC. Naimi defends OPEC’s actions on production, sees prices stabilizing. OPEC Bulletin, 3-4 June 2015.
PAULANI, Leda M. Acumulação e rentismo: resgatando a teoria da renda de Marx para pensar o capitalismo contemporâneo. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ECONOMIA POLÍTICA, 17., 2012, Rio de Janeiro. Anais eletrônicos... Rio de Janeiro: SEP, 2012.
PISTONESI, Hector. La privatización de los sistemas eléctricos y la apropiación de la renta hidroeléctrica. Revista Brasileira de Energia, v. 3, n. 1, p. 65-88, 1993.
RICO, Julieta A. P. Biocombustíveis, alimentos e petróleo: uma análise retrospectiva da experiência brasileira. Orientador: Ildo Luis Sauer. 2013. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências) — Instituto de Energia e Ambiente da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2013.
RODRIGUES, Larissa A. Cenários econômico-financeiros da produção em campos do pré-sal sob distintos regimes regulatórios. Orientador: Ildo Luis Sauer. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências) — Instituto de Energia e Ambiente, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2016.
______; SAUER, Ildo Luís. Exploratory assessment of the economic gains of a pre-salt oil field in Brazil. Energy Policy, v. 87, p. 486-495, 2015.
SANTIAGO, Andrey. Qual a diferença entre Valor e Preço para Karl Marx?. TraduAgindo, 4 de maio de 2019. Disponível em: <https://traduagindo.com/2019/05/04/qual-a-diferenca-entre-valor-e-preco-para-karl-marx>. Acesso em: 29 ago. 2024.
SAUER, Ildo Luís. O pré-sal e a geopolítica e hegemonia do petróleo face às mudanças climáticas e à transição energética. In: MELFI, Adolpho José et al. (Org.). Recursos minerais no Brasil. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 2016. p. 316-330.
SAUER, Ildo Luís. Prefácio. In: LIMA, Paulo Cézar Ribeiro. Pré-sal, o Novo Marco Legal e a capitalização da Petrobras. Rio de Janeiro: Synergia, 2011. p. IX-XXVII.
SAUER, Ildo Luís. Pré-sal brasileiro: uma nova independência?. Interesse Nacional, São Paulo, p. 40-52, 1 fev. 2010.
______. Uma análise do sistema de reatores regeneradores à água leve como alternativa de geração nuclelétrica no Brasil. Orientadores: Luiz Pinguelli Rosa e Arnaldo Aloísio Teles Ribeiro. Tese (Mestrado em Ciências) — Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 1981.
______ et al. Bolivia and Paraguay: a beacon for sustainable electric mobility?. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 51, p. 910-925, 2015.
SAUER, Ildo Luís; RODRIGUES, Larissa Araújo. Pré-sal e Petrobras além dos discursos e mitos: disputas, riscos e desafios. Estudos Avançados, v. 30, p. 185-229, 2016.
THE WHITE HOUSE. Blueprint for a secure energy future. Washington, March 30, 2011.